
This is a blog I’ve wanted to write for a while and lately some signs have been pushing me to it. So here goes.
Should women completely be themselves or should they adjust who they really are to suit what the man is looking for? Sounds like a simple question but it really isn’t.
I watched ‘Just Wright’ (starring Queen Latifah and Common) a day or two ago and the first half of the movie more or less summed up my thoughts on the subject. Latifah’s character, Leslie Wright, goes on a blind date and it seems like a fun date. They get along, they’re laughing, flirting, having great conversation, the whole nine yards. At the end of the date, the guy says he really had fun with her, she’s good people and he’d like to be just friends. I could feel Leslie’s disappointment because it mirrors what I go through all the time. Let’s just be friends.
When Leslie gets home, her cousin Morgan asks her how the date went.
- Leslie says, ‘Dude just wants me to be his homegirl.’
- Morgan says, ‘Well you do have homegirl written all over you.’
- Leslie counters, ‘I’m just being myself.’
- Morgan replies, ‘You should never be yourself with a guy, unless you’re five years into the marriage.’
That right there is what I’m referring to. To be or not to be? I struggle with this myself. Leslie’s whole date right up to her conversation with Morgan is like me to the T. I have homegirl written all over me, because I am completely, 100% myself. But Morgan taught both Leslie and I a thing or two, perhaps being yourself isn’t very effective.
Morgan pretended to be someone else through-out the movie and she snagged her prized target. She wore a tight dress and heels to a basketball game, while Leslie donned a jersey and jeans. I know I would have worn a jersey and jeans. Morgan pretended to like volunteering because her target does charity work. She took out her weave, because her target doesn’t like weaves. She became the type of woman he liked and she got him.
Lately, before I even went to the watch the movie, I’ve been thinking that snagging a man is a strategy. No one can pretend it’s not. Women treat getting a man like marketing a product or service. The overarching goal is to: Get married and have babies. So if that is the goal, what must you do to get there? You identify your target man and then define his needs and preferences. What does he like to do? Who are his friends? What’s his personality? What are his pet peeves? Then you assess the product you have to offer. Does your product fit with your target’s needs and preferences? If it doesn’t, then you need to tweak your product, by a lot or by a little depends on the man and yourself.
An even better analogy may be that of a job interview. There are more single women than there are single men. Likewise, there are more unemployed people than hiring companies. With literally thousands vying for the same job, you must make sure what you have to offer is specific to what the company is looking for and stands out above the masses, even if that means some exaggeration here and there. You’ll deal with your ability to execute on your promises later. That’s the game. Full stop. And this game works well because guys can’t really read women. They can’t tell who’s pretending and who’s not. They think they can, they will argue they can, but trust me, they really can’t. A woman can be who a man want her to be for life.
A short while ago, I met a guy I really like and I was discussing this crush with my friends. One of them raised a concern. She said this guy seems like a pretty quiet guy, am I sure that would work with my personality? My immediate (I tell you, she barely finished and I responded) reaction was, ‘Oh I have really toned down.’ And I responded not just with words but my whole body softened. I placed my hands demurely together and smiled a sweet smile. It wasn’t an act, honestly. I meant it. But then I wonder; if this guy was gregarious and my friend asked if I could match his spirit, what would I say? I suspect I would have said, ‘Come on, you know me, I can be as outgoing as anyone else.’
I think every little adjustment can count as pretense. Let’s say you’re an outgoing, open minded, free your mind type of girl. You meet a guy today and you like him bad, you want to tell him, but he’s not quite like that. So you wait till he’s ready to hear it. Isn’t that a form of adjusting who you are? You want to have a third beer or glass of wine, but he’s still nursing his first and you don’t want to scare him, so you switch to water. You were in bed till 1pm on a Sunday nursing a hangover but when he calls you tell him you went to church. He says he likes natural women and you immediately cancel your weekly weave and nails appointment. You’re a slob who leaves dishes piled in the sink for at least a day but each weekend he stays over or you stay at his, you hand wash every utensil, make the bed immediately you wake up and pretend a water stain on the coffee table drives you crazy. You’ve slept with 10 guys, but he’s only had 3 partners, so you edit your number down to 2. Well, almost all women lie about that, so maybe that doesn’t count. But we make millions and millions of little adjustments for men. Seriously, it all adds up. How do we keep track? How do we know which personality is supposed to be at play?
I was in a long-term relationship with a guy who was a sports fan – basketball, football (aka soccer), pool (which I will regard a sport) and whatever else. During that relationship, I was an avid basketball and football fan. I knew the name of each Lakers player. I was schooled in 3-pointers, free throws, dunks, you name it. I never missed his court games and I never missed any seasons, All-Star game or Slam Dunk competitions either. I was also a die-hard Hearts of Oak and Manchester United fan. Those were his teams so I didn’t support any other teams. Since the relationship ended, it’s mainly through Facebook that I know there is some basketball or football game going on. And I definitely can’t throw any stats your way. So what does that mean? Was I pretending during my relationship? No, I wasn’t. I did love basketball and football. But did I subconsciously love it because it was his life? Probably. There was another guy I was in love with who was crazy about Formula One and Grand Prix motorcycle racing. So I started following the races, got deep into Schumacher, Rossi and Lewis Hamilton. Since we parted ways, I have no idea what’s going on in the world of Rossi and all I know about Hamilton is that he and Nicole Scherzinger broke up. Is it okay to care about something because your man cares about it? Is that a form of pretense? I don’t know. Maybe it’s pretense if you hate it or can’t stand it but you act like you’re into it.
Last week, just before I posted the Sexual Lessons blog, I hesitated because of the guy I’m crushing on and I wasn’t sure how he’d take such a bold blog. Thankfully my hesitation was for a split second.
Whatever the case may be, conscious or unconscious, women tailor who they really are to suit men, all the time. And it gets so bad that we begin to lose sight of our true selves and what we want. Their dreams become our dreams. Their teams become our teams. Their lives become our lives. We do this in order to ‘snag’ them and some continue to do this in order to keep them. It’s the way of the jungle. You have to be a little sneaky to catch your prey.
I really tend to do me, but now I think it’s time to be a little more strategic and targeted. I think it’s time to do some ‘editing’ if need be. My ‘I am who I am, independent style’ isn’t working. The whole ‘take me as I am or leave it’ attitude is a tough sell in this competitive and brutal world.
If you’re true to yourself, you CAN get your man. But what are the odds? Life isn’t a fairytale or a movie. It’s up to you and in the end, a lot of men can’t tell. To be or not to be?
(I can imagine what the comments will be. The women will say, ‘I am always myself!’ And the men will say, ‘Be yourselves, we can always tell.’ Yeah, whatever).
I think strategy is definately important, but it should not compromise who you are, because you will end up getting theguy alright, and he will end up leaving you alright, as soon as he finds out who you truly are, especially if you tweek your personality. So i mean mos def, if you dont wear heels all the time, maybe wear it on the first date or two, but i dont think you should get a whole make over just to get the guy and then you cannot even keep up with the fake nails and weave. i guess its more of a market yourself by highlighting the good things, not embellishing ur true character in a lie.
I think it’s ok to change some things for a guy so long as it doesn’t conflict with any personal convictions or beliefs. If you like a guy, it’s natural to take interest in things he likes and he probably does same for you. It helps to increase your shared interests and your guy will likely appreciate all the effort.What I don’t believe in deceiving guys about things we like or how we really are. If he loves dogs and I hate them,I don’t gain anything by lying about that because he will find out.I keep my hair natural but the typical Ghanaian guy prefers a woman with a perm. I know at least 2 guys who have walked away just because of my hair. But that is not something I’m willing to compromise. So love me, love my hair or move on.And I actually told one guy that who kept insisting I perm my hair. If you come clean and make the effort to share their interests you might lose a few people but you probably don’t want those……so be true to yourself. Any good guy will appreciate you for that…..
Anyone who maintains that they’re completely themselves is a liar in my books. I think at some point we’ve all made changes to ‘get’ a man even if it was very subtle.
I definitely agree that snagging your ‘man’ involves some kinda strategy. If making superficial changes helps you win your man and its an improvement then by all means go for it. As you rightly say, it is very important not to compromise who you are and what you believe in, just so you can ‘get’ the man who may not even be appreciative of the sacrifices you’ve made. Then resentment sets in!!
It is okay to be supportive of our partners and be interested in the things that are important to them but don’t be totally immersed in it.
Why does it seem that we are always making changes and are prepared to be with guys; but we readily accept them for who and what they are (flaws and all)?
Lewis Hamilton and Nicole S dated? What? When? How? Why? Anyway I’m guessing you can’t answer these q’s so i shall move on
I don’t even know what to say (or write) first in response to your blog. On one hand i think we (women) give guys too much airspace, i don’t see any man strategising on how to ‘catch’ the woman of his dreams…usually any strategising is on how to shag the woman he’s lusting after.
I think the way forward on how to attract the right man in your life depends on your end goal. Do you want a man because you have been socialised into believing that at a certain age you should meet a nice man, get married and settle down with 3 children? Is what is important to you the notion of being married and having children within a socially sanctioned union? If so sure, treat getting a man they same way you would go for a job, highlight your positives and de-emphasise your negatives. Honestly i don’t believe that is the path to happiness. I think too may of us assume a relationship/man will make us happy when many relationships are sooooo not working. Yes when relationships work its great but really how many of them are really and truly working?
@Nana, yes oh, Hamilton and Nicole dated for awhile. They broke up earlier this year or sometime late last year.
I guess the general consensus is some strategy is required, just depends on what the goal is, whether it compromises your beliefs or if you can maintain the charade long-term.
I agree with Bonnie, anyone who says they have NEVER ever made any adjustments probably has selective memory. Plus admitting you’re not 100% truthful is like saying you’re stunningly beautiful – its frowned upon. Who really wants to admit they pretend, even if its just a little?
To be honest, I think crafting a strategy itself is a little pretentious. Strategy means planning, calculated thoughts, deliberate actions – which equals you’re not being 100% you.
As soon as you start to think of how you can better package yourself, you will make some tweaks, consciously or unconciously, you will change something. And I’m not referring to physical tweaks like heels. As soon as you begin to strategize, you will make internal adjustments as well. Its not that easy to seperate the two.
@Nana, I forgot to add this. Men don’t strategize because there are more single women than men. He has options, several options. Women normally don’t. So we need to figure out how to stand out. He doesn’t. He can do a, b, c, d, e and pick one
what really gets my goat is when our own female friends, sisters, mothers, etc. try to get us to change who we are so we can snag/keep a guy… “don’t you know ladies don’t drink beer”, “oh won’t you put on small makeup”, etc. if i like you i’ll definitely make an effort to look nice but not to the extent that it conflicts with what i’m most comfortable with. i’m a poor liar, but even those who are good at it can’t fake it forever.
I think the numbers of women relative to men is something like 51% women to 49% men on a global scale so really there are not that many more women to men. Maybe more women should consider dating other women and get a sperm donor when they want to have children.
Hey good people. I’ve been away a while, I’m now going thru to see what I’ve missed… This is an interesting post – I guess it’s true that everyone has ‘tweaked’ him/herself to be 100% what they think the other person wants, but the big question is ‘how much has it helped?’ One of the biggest problems with this is the fact that you’ll always have some explaining to do when you’re ‘out of character.’
My personal opinion is founded on three little gems of advice, hopefully, it will help those of you who are caught in the middle – “Just be you”:
1. If you don’t feel you, how do you expect someone else to? – when you first ’spot’ someone and are attracted to him/her, it’s gonna be generally based on that first impression. Make it count by being consistent!
2. A sprung trap always returns to it’s original state (or something like that-i’m paraphrasing here
– simply means, when there’s a crisis, we go back to basics. Don’t be surprised when a sugared-up, educated man leans and yells, “Ony*********!” at the tro-tro driver who just scratched his car.
3. Women don’t dress to impress men, but rather to compete with other women – dunno if it’s true, but I was told this by a wise woman, and it looks plausible. Even if it’s not true, still do you, and not him – one man might think you’re hot, while another might think you’re a ho’
My two pesewas…
I would like to firstly say I really enjoy reading your blog. I discovered it a few days ago and can’t stop reading! (much to the detriment of my work) Anyway, I feel you with the whole strategy thing.
I am also a girl who likes to parade herself as a “I am what I am” character. But your post led me to think…I can’t really be myself all the time if I add and drop different artists/genres of music to my list of favourites depending on who I’m on a date with and if my hair style changes depending on what he likes, right?
And a much as I hate myself for saying so, I actually agree with you – we do it on our CVs and at job interviews, so why shouldn’t a bit of delete-copy-paste work in our relationships?
@Nana, i was referring to single men vs. single women.
@Afrocentric, ‘delete-copy-paste?’ Frigging, frigging hysterical! I think that’s my phrase for the week!
Leroy, agreed, we gotta be consistent. So for instance, if (using Abla’s example) I don’t typically wear heels, and I wear heels on my first date with a guy, manage to ’snag’ him and then never wear heels again, thats deception right? But does that mean I shouldn’t make an effort to step out of my comfort zone and get dolled up? If you don’t step out of your comfort zone every now and then, perhaps you need to change the type of man you’re looking for.
What I mean is, if you’re a ‘hobo’ or ‘gypsy’ type of girl (flats, long, flowy dresses and tops, jeans, simple tees) and you want to date a professional man who entertains a lot, then sorry but every now and then you gotta consider some heels.
Is the solution for us to only want men who dress, sound and ‘look’ like us, and will accept our lifestyle choices 100%? Ehh, I don’t think so. We can’t always chose who we like. So if you really like him, deeply, then a few uncomfortable changes won’t hurt.
Honestly, for me, its tough to be 100% yourself. You may think you are, but I doubt that.
nah, I’m not saying we can always be 100% ourselves, especially since there’s always one or two little things about us that someone else wouldn’t like. The point is, aren’t you cheating yourself if you become something else just because he/she likes you that way? How far then would you expect him/her to change for you? Also, what happens when the new you becomes unlikeable to other people who used to like you, like family or close friends?
The person who gave me the advice about the ’sprung trap’ bottled the whole thing down to ‘compatibility,’ in the simple sense that we all have our comfort zones and upbringing, and we should be looking out for people with something similar – or at least something we’ll be comfortable with.
I realised though that this ‘comfort/compatibility’ in a relationship needs love to survive cos it’s only love that’s gonna make you accept some of those things you don’t like about the other person, or change those things about you that the other person doesn’t like.
It’s worked well for me so far, and yeah, I think I can safely say I’m still at least 75% still me (with some improvements and downgrades here n there lol)
I have seen in movies, a scene where a lady hears a knock and runs to the bedroom to change her dress, and make up to meet their man.; and the guys saying wow you look stunning… and sitting back saying in my head, “who is she fooling”. You can do this scene at home and be pardon for it but when it comes to character and who you really are, seriously, we need to be open about it.
The big question has always been who are you fooling? If you are not what you portray to be, you may live a thousand years with your partner, the mid night of the thousand and one day, u will expose your true self. Better be yourself and let the man accept you for who you are rather than, trying to “put” up a face that you are not.
I don’t believe anyone can be consistently constant. For instance, I take the same route to work every day but there’s certain days when I want to change it up. In a similar fashion, humans need to adjust, tune and recheck ourselves constantly. I honestly don’t see anything wrong with putting my “best-person”.
If we’re all honest, we will admit that we are not always our best in the absence of others. Heck we even try to be on our best behaviour for the people we work for how much more for the people we want to spend the rest of our lives with.
What if the people we love really do bring out the best in us?
Maxine, love it, love it, love it. You summed up everything i’ve been saying perfectly. “No one can be consistenly constant. We are not always our best in the absence of others.” Its just not possible to be yourself 100% all the time. And there’s nothing wrong with trying to be ‘better.’ But of course as soon as I said that the question that popped into my head is – who defines what’s better? You or the man you’re interested in? lolololol.
Ah well.
I agree with you on the Goal & Strategy approach. Can’t go wrong with that business-like
Just gotta market & sell to the right people.
Some folks look for partners in the wrong places. Nana Darkoa’s post on dating outside one’s class is a piece of this puzzle too. Besides social & education class, folks need to know their worth and get in where they fit in.
Now, about being one’s self. I disagree that you should never be yourself the first 5 years of a relationship. That thing will crumble after 5 years 1 day. We all swing a tad from our normal selves depending on the situation at hand. It is normal and acceptable but just like every quality product, you will have problems with your client when you don’t minimize variability. Whilst taking the business route, I’ll say Six Sigma the Goal & Strategy approach. That will guarantee success.
Boakyewaa, you write ridiculously well. Discovered your blog in relation to the book and it’s already a favorite.
Everyone puts their best foot forward at the start of a relationship: both men and women. We all want to make a good first impression.
I don’t think it’s that there are that many more women to men. Even if there were, not every single woman is a perfect match or great catch for every single guy. We all have to wade through the waters. Whatever way you cut it, it takes time (and much trial and error) to find the right (kind of) person.
I agree with everyone who says it’s natural to be a little altered by a relationship. I don’t agree with the need for strategy beyond instinct though. I think Morgan’s method only works out in the short-term. Yes, it will get you a man. He may be right for you: but are you right for him? You can’t take that as a given. Sounds like the kind of thing that leads to drama when the truth hits the fan.
Especially five years into a relationship when then stakes are so much higher.
Being yourself is hardly the scenic route. But it seems to me to be the only path to the Land of Genuinely Good Lovin’. People just need to get past this overblown fear of being alone. Loneliness rarely lasts forever.
My mother is 60, on her third marriage, and almost a decade into their marriage, I really think this guy is the one for her. To think he came along when she discovered herself and learned not to settle or pretend.
Excellent post. Hope to read a lot more good posts in the future.
I really don’t believe in pretending or being something other than myself. I have been married before and about to get married again and I have always been myself. If a man can’t love me for who I am then goodbye to him because with or without him I will be happy. I mean,honestly what is he doing to make me want to settle down with him? Ladies need to know their true value and stop trying to compromise themselves for some man.
My heart and soul and being agree with Nana Darkoah. Why am I the one to be tweaking to suit him? And if we say men also tweak to suit us then aren’t we gonna get to the point when neither of us is being genuine? BUT…that said…Esi Cleland is being herself when she gets a sakora. She doesn’t care much for weaves or long hair and would rather step into the shower, and rain and not step in the salon for months! That works for her. She likes how she looks. But…i’ve had a guy tell me…i looked beautiful when i had hair. Implying…i’m ugly now. In such a situation, if the guy is one I want, ehm, i guess that means growing the hair back fast. Another guy says…you look nice when you wear dresses and heels. But I feel most myself when i wear cargo pants and converse shoes. But hey, if i want the guy, i’ll change the way I dress. If I keep changing all these things to suit the guy, then what are we left with? Some girl I don’t know. I guess in an ideal world you will meet the guy who likes you just the way you are. I think it may be worth waiting for that man who gets it. I work in advertising and once, a woman told me…can’t i see that she gets more attention from men ‘cos she dresses like the stereotypical sexy girl….My response…the men who like that stereotypical sexy girl are not my target. hehe! The look I have attracts a certain kind of man. There may be only 5 of such men in a group of 100 men. Those 5 men are my peeps. They get me. The 95 can go chase someone else. Afterall, isn’t it only 1 man i’m gonna make babies with in the end? Mtseeeeeew!
You raise a very very good point, Esi.
I do believe in 3 things: 1. some of the changes we make to suit, attract or keep a man may be unconscious, doesnt even register. 2. i do think it is okay to make some changes, so long as it doesn’t affect our core beliefs, and our core personalities. 3. In the end, what is most important is our self esteem.
I hate heels with a passion, but that’s an outward dislike in a way. Wearing heels one day for a date will not damage or even dent my perception of who I am, and what I stand for. My self esteem will still remain intact even if i wear heels once a blue moon, like on our wedding day or a couple of dates.
To me thats the sum of it. We WILL always make little changes, sometimes for ourselves,sometimes for our parents, and sometimes for a significant other. Nothing wrong with that, so long as your core beliefs and self esteem remains intact.